Name: KELLY LUCAS SANTIAGO
Publication date: 22/10/2021
Advisor:
Name |
Role |
|---|---|
| GILTON LUÍS FERREIRA | Advisor * |
Examining board:
| Name |
Role |
|---|---|
| ALVIM BORGES DA SILVA FILHO | Internal Examiner * |
| GILTON LUÍS FERREIRA | Advisor * |
| MARIA HELENA ELPIDIO ABREU | External Examiner * |
Summary: The work expresses the results of the research entitled Qualification of Popular Participation in
Urban Land Regularization Projects (REURB): Developed in the Graduate Program in
Engineering and Sustainable Development (PPGES) at the Federal University of Espírito Santo
UFES, in the research line: Sustainable Management and Energy. Currently, popular
participation in urban policies permeates a large part of the biographies, which demonstrate its
evolution with the decline of the military regime in the 1980s, driven by popular movements
that led the Urban Reform, culminating in the insertion of articles 182 and 183 in the Federal
Constitution of 1988, regulated by the City Statute in the 2000s. The present investigation was
based on the limitations presented by the authors who discuss popular participation, theoretical
framework that supported the research, which aims to define guiding principles and relevant
thematic areas for qualification and strengthening of popular participation in REURB projects
and brings elements to think about real possibilities for qualifying popular participation from
Popular Education. To do so, initially a bibliographic research was carried out in order
toidentify the limitations of popular participation in the elaboration of urban policies in Brazil.
From these results, using bibliographic research and content analysis as a technical procedure,
we sought todefine contents and guiding principles for qualifying popular participation in Land
Regularization projects - REURB.A qualitative analysis of 26 booklets dealing with land tenure
regularization policy was carried out, using the MAXQDA software for qualitative content
analysis. The analysis of the results showed that the booklets are information materials, not
being adequate to the principles of popular education for training processes, revealed that,
although the articles address the theme of housing policy in Brazil, there is still a need to go
deeper into relevant issues. and expansion of the discussion, in order to provide subsidies for
critical thinking.
